Inforsys LLC https://inforsysllc.com/ Protecting Your Business. Simplifying Cybersecurity. Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:56:53 +0000 en hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1 https://inforsysllc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/cropped-INFORSYS-LLC_icononly-32x32.png Inforsys LLC https://inforsysllc.com/ 32 32 What a Vulnerability Assessment Actually Finds https://inforsysllc.com/what-a-vulnerability-assessment-actually-finds/ Sat, 29 Aug 2026 13:30:00 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=977 (and Why You Need One Before an Audit) “We have antivirus. We’re fine.” It’s an understandable assumption. If your computers have antivirus software, your firewall is turned on, and your employees know not to click suspicious links, it can feel like your business is reasonably protected. But basic security tools are only part of the […]

The post What a Vulnerability Assessment Actually Finds appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
  • Cybersecurity

What a Vulnerability Assessment Actually Finds

(and Why You Need One Before an Audit)

  • Inforsys LLC

“We have antivirus. We’re fine.”

It’s an understandable assumption. If your computers have antivirus software, your firewall is turned on, and your employees know not to click suspicious links, it can feel like your business is reasonably protected.

But basic security tools are only part of the picture.

You can have antivirus installed and still have an unpatched system. You can have a firewall and still have unnecessary ports exposed. You can require strong passwords and still have accounts that aren’t protected by multi-factor authentication.

The difference is between having security tools and knowing where your security gaps are.

That’s where a vulnerability assessment comes in. A vulnerability assessment helps identify weaknesses in your systems, devices, applications, and configurations so you can address them before an attacker—or an auditor—finds them first.

What Is a Vulnerability Assessment, Exactly?

A vulnerability assessment is a systematic review of your technology environment designed to identify security weaknesses.

Think of it like a health check for your IT environment.

Instead of waiting for something to go wrong, an assessment looks for potential problems while you still have time to fix them. Depending on the scope, this can include reviewing computers, servers, network devices, applications, user accounts, configurations, and other technology your business relies on.

The goal isn’t simply to produce a long list of technical problems. A useful assessment should help you understand:

  • What vulnerabilities exist
  • Which systems are affected
  • How serious each vulnerability is
  • What could happen if the vulnerability were exploited
  • Which issues should be addressed first

 

It’s also important to understand how a vulnerability assessment differs from penetration testing.

A vulnerability assessment identifies potential weaknesses. Penetration testing goes a step further by attempting to exploit identified weaknesses to determine whether they can actually be used to gain unauthorized access or cause harm.

Both can play an important role in a broader cybersecurity program, but they serve different purposes.

For a business preparing for an audit or trying to strengthen its security posture, a vulnerability assessment is often a practical place to start.

What It Actually Uncovers

So, what does a vulnerability assessment actually find?

The answer depends on your environment and the scope of the assessment, but there are several common issues that frequently surface.

Outdated Software and Unpatched Systems

One of the most common problems is software that hasn’t been updated or patched.

Software vendors regularly release security updates to address known vulnerabilities. When those updates aren’t installed, attackers may be able to take advantage of weaknesses that are already publicly known.

An assessment can help identify systems running outdated operating systems, applications, firmware, or other software.

This matters because attackers don’t always need a sophisticated new technique. Sometimes, they simply look for organizations that haven’t fixed a vulnerability that has been known for months or even years.

Weak Passwords and Missing MFA

Passwords remain an important part of your organization’s security, but they can also be a major weakness.

A vulnerability assessment may identify accounts with weak password practices, unnecessary privileges, or other security concerns. It can also reveal where multi-factor authentication (MFA) hasn’t been implemented.

MFA adds another layer of protection by requiring users to provide additional verification beyond a password.

For organizations that handle sensitive information or work under specific contractual or compliance requirements, identifying accounts that aren’t adequately protected can be an important step toward reducing risk.

Misconfigured Firewalls and Open Ports

Your firewall may be w and still be configured in a way that creates unnecessary exposure.

A vulnerability assessment can examine network configurations and identify issues such as unnecessarily open ports, outdated firewall rules, or services that shouldn’t be accessible from outside the network.

These aren’t always obvious problems.

A setting that made sense when a system was first configured may no longer be necessary today. Over time, businesses add applications, devices, remote access tools, and other services. Without regular reviews, those changes can leave behind unnecessary points of exposure.

Unmanaged Devices and Shadow IT

Do you know every device connected to your business network?

For many small businesses, the answer isn’t always yes.

Employees may connect personal devices, install software without IT approval, or use cloud applications that haven’t been reviewed by the organization. This is sometimes referred to as shadow IT.

An assessment can help identify devices and systems that may not be properly managed or monitored.

The problem isn’t necessarily that every unauthorized application or device is malicious. The issue is that you can’t properly protect what you don’t know exists.

Third-Party and Vendor Access Risks

Your business may not be the only organization with access to your systems.

IT providers, software vendors, contractors, cloud platforms, and other third parties may have some level of access to your environment.

That access can create additional risk if accounts are overly privileged, no longer needed, or inadequately protected.

A vulnerability assessment can help identify third-party access that should be reviewed, restricted, or removed.

Why This Matters Before an Audit or Contract Renewal

Finding a vulnerability during an internal assessment is very different from finding it during an audit.

When you discover a problem yourself, you have the opportunity to investigate it, document it, prioritize remediation, and make improvements before someone else asks about it.

During an audit, however, the same issue may become a finding that you need to explain and address under a deadline.

For small government contractors, this can be particularly important.

Security requirements can be tied to contracts, compliance frameworks, and relationships with prime contractors or government customers. Being able to demonstrate that your organization actively identifies and addresses vulnerabilities can help show that cybersecurity isn’t simply something you think about when an audit is approaching.

There’s also a trust factor.

Clients and prime contractors want to know that their information is being handled responsibly. Discovering security gaps and addressing them proactively demonstrates that your organization takes that responsibility seriously.

A vulnerability assessment doesn’t guarantee that your environment is completely secure. No assessment can make that promise.

What it does provide is visibility.

And visibility gives you the opportunity to fix problems before they become bigger ones.

How Often Should You Run a Vulnerability Assessment?

There’s no single schedule that works for every organization, but at least annually is a practical starting point for many small businesses.

However, don’t think of an annual assessment as the only time you should look for vulnerabilities.

You should also consider conducting an assessment after significant changes to your environment, such as:

  • Installing new servers or network equipment
  • Moving to a new cloud platform
  • Deploying major software or applications
  • Making significant network changes
  • Acquiring another company
  • Adding remote access capabilities
  • Experiencing a security incident

Your technology environment isn’t static. New devices are added, software changes, employees come and go, and vendors gain or lose access.

Your assessment strategy should account for those changes.

What Happens After the Assessment?

A vulnerability assessment is only useful if you do something with the results.

The next step is typically remediation planning.

Not every vulnerability needs to be fixed in the same way or at the same time. Your IT or cybersecurity team should prioritize findings based on factors such as severity, business impact, likelihood of exploitation, and the systems involved.

Some fixes may be relatively simple, such as applying a software patch or disabling an unnecessary account.

Others may require larger projects, such as replacing outdated systems, changing network architecture, strengthening access controls, or implementing additional security monitoring.

The assessment gives you the roadmap. Remediation is how you act on it.

From there, ongoing security measures such as security policies and continuous monitoring can help keep your environment from drifting back into an insecure state.

Find the Gaps Before Someone Else Does

The goal of a vulnerability assessment isn’t to prove that your business has perfect security.

It’s to find the weaknesses you don’t know about yet.

For small government contractors, that visibility can be especially valuable before an audit, contract renewal, or compliance review. Instead of waiting for someone else to identify a problem, you can take the initiative to find it, prioritize it, and start fixing it.

Not sure what’s hiding in your network?

Inforsys offers vulnerability and threat assessments built for small government contractors. We can help identify your security gaps, prioritize what needs attention, and give you a clearer path toward a stronger security posture.

 

Ready to find your vulnerabilities before someone else does? Contact Inforsys to get started.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post What a Vulnerability Assessment Actually Finds appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]> How to Build an Incident Response Plan Without an In-House IT Team https://inforsysllc.com/how-to-build-an-incident-response-plan-without-an-in-house-it-team/ Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:00:00 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=963 It’s 2 a.m. Your team is locked out of its systems. Files won’t open, email is down, and a message on your screen says your data has been encrypted. Do you know what to do next? An incident response plan is the difference between a controlled response and total chaos. For many small contractors and […]

The post How to Build an Incident Response Plan Without an In-House IT Team appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
  • Incident Response

How to Build an Incident Response Plan Without an In-House IT Team

  • Inforsys LLC

It’s 2 a.m. Your team is locked out of its systems. Files won’t open, email is down, and a message on your screen says your data has been encrypted.

Do you know what to do next? An incident response plan is the difference between a controlled response and total chaos.

For many small contractors and businesses, the answer is probably, “Call someone and figure it out.”

That’s understandable when you don’t have a full-time IT department. But when a cybersecurity incident happens, every minute matters. Without a clear plan, even a relatively contained incident can quickly become a costly business disruption.

The good news? You don’t need an in-house IT team to have an effective incident response plan.

With a few clearly defined procedures, assigned responsibilities, and the right technology partner, a small business can be prepared to detect, contain, communicate, and recover from a security incident.

Why Small Contractors Can’t Skip This

Cybersecurity incidents aren’t just a concern for large corporations. Small contractors can be attractive targets because they often handle valuable business, employee, customer, or government-related information without having the same cybersecurity resources as larger organizations.

Having an incident response plan is also a core part of good cybersecurity risk and compliance management, it’s one of the first things auditors and prime contractors look for when evaluating whether a subcontractor takes security seriously.

Your insurance provider may also expect you to have documented cybersecurity policies and procedures. Depending on your coverage, failing to follow required security practices could complicate a claim after an incident.

There’s also the issue of trust.

If a client’s information is compromised through your systems, they will want to know what happened, what you did about it, and what you’re doing to prevent it from happening again.

An incident response plan gives you a structured answer instead of scrambling to make decisions during a crisis.

The 5 Core Elements of a Basic Incident Response Plan

Your plan doesn’t need to be a 50-page technical document. Start with five essential components.

1. Detection and Reporting

The first step is knowing how an incident gets reported.

Your employees should know what suspicious activity looks like and who to contact when they see it. For example, an employee might notice:

  • A suspicious email or attachment
  • Unexpected password reset notifications
  • Unusual computer behavior
  • Missing or encrypted files
  • Unauthorized access to an account
  • A lost or stolen company device

 

Your plan should identify a specific person or role who receives these reports first.

Make the reporting process simple. Employees shouldn’t have to wonder whether something is “serious enough” to report. When in doubt, they should have a clear path for escalating the issue.

2. Containment

Once you identify a potential incident, the next priority is preventing it from spreading.

Containment might include disconnecting an affected computer from the network, disabling a compromised account, blocking a malicious email, or restricting access to affected systems.

The important thing is to define these actions before an emergency happens.

Your plan should specify who has authority to take systems offline and when an outside IT or cybersecurity provider should be contacted.

Avoid having employees make major technical decisions on their own. A well-defined escalation process can prevent a small problem from becoming a larger one.

3. Communication

A cybersecurity incident can quickly become a communication problem as well as a technical one.

Your plan should identify who communicates with employees, management, customers, vendors, and other stakeholders.

If sensitive information may have been exposed, communication becomes especially important. Depending on the situation and applicable requirements, you may need to notify affected parties, legal counsel, insurance providers, or government agencies.

Keep communication responsibilities separate from technical response whenever possible. The person investigating the incident may not be the best person to communicate with clients.

Most importantly, establish communication channels that don’t depend entirely on the systems that may be compromised.

4. Recovery

Once the threat has been contained, you need a plan for getting back to normal.

Recovery may include:

  • Restoring systems from backups
  • Resetting compromised passwords
  • Rebuilding affected devices
  • Applying security updates
  • Verifying that malicious software has been removed
  • Testing systems before returning them to normal operations

 

Backups are particularly important. But having backups isn’t enough. You should know where they are, who can access them, and whether they can actually be restored.

Regularly testing your backups can help ensure that they will be available when you need them most.

5. Post-Incident Review

The incident isn’t necessarily over just because your systems are back online.

Afterward, take time to determine what happened and why.

Ask questions such as:

  • How did the incident happen?
  • How quickly was it detected?
  • What systems or information were affected?
  • What worked well during the response?
  • Where were the delays or gaps?
  • What security controls should be improved?
  • Does the incident response plan need to change?

 

The goal isn’t to assign blame. It’s to learn from the incident and reduce the chances of the same problem happening again.

Who Does What When You Don’t Have an IT Team?

One of the biggest challenges for a small business is figuring out who is responsible for incident response when there isn’t an IT department.

Start by designating an incident response point person. This doesn’t necessarily need to be your most technical employee. Their primary responsibility can be coordinating the response and making sure the right people are contacted.

Your plan should clearly identify:

Primary contact: Who coordinates the response?

Backup contact: Who takes over if the primary contact isn’t available?

IT support: Who handles technical investigation and containment?

Management: Who has authority to make business decisions?

Legal/insurance: Who should be contacted if sensitive information or regulated data is involved?

For businesses without internal IT expertise, consider pre-arranging support with a managed service provider and ideally, one that treats IT and cybersecurity as a single, connected function rather than two disconnected services.

The key is to establish that relationship before an incident occurs. Finding an IT provider at 2 a.m. while your systems are encrypted is very different from having a trusted partner already familiar with your environment.

A Simple Template to Get Started

Your first incident response plan doesn’t have to be complicated.

Create a simple document that includes:

  1. Emergency contacts – IT provider, management, insurance, legal counsel, and other important contacts.
  2. Incident reporting process – What employees should report and who they should contact.
  3. Containment procedures – Initial steps for isolating affected systems or accounts.
  4. Communication procedures – Who communicates with employees, clients, and other stakeholders.
  5. Backup and recovery information – Where backups are located and how systems are restored.
  6. Incident documentation – Where details, timelines, and actions are recorded.
  7. Post-incident review – How lessons learned will be documented and improvements made.

 

Once you’ve created the plan, don’t just save it in a folder and forget about it.

Review it regularly and test it with your team. A short tabletop exercise such as walking through what you would do if ransomware affected your file server can reveal gaps before a real emergency exposes them. CISA’s incident response guidance offers a useful framework if you want a starting reference point.

Be Ready Before the Incident Happens

An incident response plan isn’t about predicting exactly what will happen. It’s about making sure your team knows what to do when something goes wrong.

For small contractors without an in-house IT department, having a documented plan can provide structure during a stressful situation, support compliance efforts, protect client relationships, and potentially reduce the impact of a cybersecurity incident.

Most importantly, you don’t have to build it alone.

Inforsys can help you build and test an incident response plan tailored to your business, so your team knows what to do before you ever need it.

Don’t wait for the 2 a.m. phone call. Start building your incident response plan today.

Schedule a consultation at www.inforsysllc.com

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post How to Build an Incident Response Plan Without an In-House IT Team appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]> 5 Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Cybersecurity Provider for Your Government Contract https://inforsysllc.com/5-questions-to-ask-before-hiring-a-cybersecurity-provider-for-your-government-contract/ Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:05:00 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=943 – Don’t Sign Anything Until You’ve Asked These Hiring a cybersecurity provider feels straightforward until you’re sitting across from a vendor who uses terms you’ve never heard, promises things that sound comprehensive, and hands you a proposal that doesn’t mention your contract requirements once. For small government contractors, choosing the wrong cybersecurity provider isn’t just […]

The post 5 Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Cybersecurity Provider for Your Government Contract appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
  • Cybersecurity, Government Contractors

5 Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Cybersecurity Provider for Your Government Contract

- Don't Sign Anything Until You've Asked These

  • Inforsys LLC

Hiring a cybersecurity provider feels straightforward until you’re sitting across from a vendor who uses terms you’ve never heard, promises things that sound comprehensive, and hands you a proposal that doesn’t mention your contract requirements once.

For small government contractors, choosing the wrong cybersecurity provider isn’t just a bad business decision. It’s a compliance risk. The right provider protects your contract. The wrong one gives you a false sense of security, right up until your next audit.

Before you sign anything, ask these five questions. The answers will tell you everything you need to know.

Question 1:

Do you have experience working with federal government contractors specifically?

This is the first filter and it eliminates a lot of providers immediately.

General IT and cybersecurity vendors know how to secure networks. But securing a network for a government contractor is a different job. It involves understanding DFARS clauses, knowing what Controlled Unclassified Information is and how it needs to be handled, and being familiar with the documentation requirements that come with federal contracts.

A provider who’s never worked in the defense industrial base will learn on your dime. That’s not a position you want to be in when a compliance deadline is approaching.

✔ What you want to hear: Specific experience with DoD contractors, familiarity with DFARS 252.204-7012, and ideally references from other contractors they’ve supported.
✘ Red flag: Vague answers about ‘working with government clients’ without specifics, or a blank look when you mention NIST SP 800-171.

Question 2:

Can you help me document my security controls not just implement them?

A lot of cybersecurity providers are great at putting technical controls in place. Firewalls, endpoint protection, MFA, they know how to deploy these things. What many of them can’t do is help you document those controls in a way that satisfies a federal auditor.

For government contractors, documentation is just as important as the controls themselves. NIST SP 800-171 requires a System Security Plan that describes how each security requirement is addressed in your environment. If your provider can set everything up but can’t help you write that plan, you’re only halfway there.

✔ What you want to hear: Yes, we help clients build and maintain their System Security Plan, and we can walk you through what federal auditors typically look for.

✘ Red flag: ‘We handle the technical side, you handle the paperwork.’

Question 3:

What does your incident response process look like and how fast can you move?

When something goes wrong and eventually something will your provider’s response speed matters more than almost anything else. Under DFARS, you have 72 hours from the time you discover a breach to report it to the DoD Cyber Crime Center. That clock doesn’t stop for slow vendor response times.

Ask specifically: what happens when you call them at 2am on a Saturday? Do they have an on-call team? What’s the average time between your first call and someone actively working on your environment? And critically, do they understand what evidence needs to be preserved before anyone starts trying to fix things?

✔ What you want to hear: A clear, documented incident response process with defined response time commitments and an understanding of federal forensic evidence requirements.

✘ Red flag: ‘We’ll get back to you within one business day.’

Question 4:

Will you give me a complete and current picture of everything on my network?

You can’t protect what you can’t see. And you can’t answer an auditor’s questions about your environment if you don’t have an accurate, up-to-date inventory of every device, user account, and application on your network.

A lot of contractors are surprised to discover that their current IT or security provider doesn’t maintain this for them. They assume someone is keeping track. Often, nobody is.

Ask your prospective provider how they handle asset management. How often is the inventory updated? How do they handle new devices being added? What about when an employee leaves, are their accounts and access removed promptly?

✔ What you want to hear: We maintain a live asset inventory as part of your ongoing service, and we can show you what it looks like right now.

✘ Red flag: ‘You’d need to track that internally’ or a vague answer about periodic reviews.

Question 5:

How do you handle the overlap between IT management and cybersecurity?

This question catches providers off guard more than any other and their answer tells you a lot.

If a provider only handles one side, IT or security, ask them directly: who manages the other side, and how do you coordinate with them? If they don’t have a clear answer, or if they’re not used to thinking about the two together, you’re looking at the gap problem that catches a lot of contractors off guard at audit time.

The best providers either handle both themselves, or have a structured, documented process for coordinating with whatever other vendor covers the other side. What you don’t want is two vendors who each assume the other is handling something, with you stuck in the middle trying to figure out who’s responsible when something goes wrong.

✔ What you want to hear: We handle both, or here’s exactly how we coordinate with your other vendor to make sure nothing falls through.

✘ Red flag: A confused pause, or ‘that’s really more of an IT question.’

One more thing before you decide

Beyond the five questions, pay attention to how the provider communicates during the sales process. Do they explain things in plain language, or do they bury you in acronyms? Do they ask about your specific contract requirements, or do they pitch you a generic package?

The way a provider sells is usually the way they service. If they’re already making you feel like you need a translator before you’ve signed anything, that doesn’t get better once you’re a client.

Here's what it all comes down to

The right cybersecurity provider for a government contractor isn’t just technically capable. They understand your compliance environment, they can document what they’ve done, and they can move fast when it matters.

Those five questions won’t get you all the way to a decision on their own but they’ll quickly separate the providers who understand your world from the ones who are figuring it out as they go.

Not sure where to start?

Inforsys LLC works specifically with SMB government contractors, managing IT, cybersecurity, and compliance documentation under one roof. If you’re evaluating providers, we’re happy to walk you through what a proper setup looks like for your contract environment, no pressure.

Schedule a consultation at www.inforsysllc.com

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post 5 Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Cybersecurity Provider for Your Government Contract appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]> Why IT and Cybersecurity Providers Shouldn’t Be Separate https://inforsysllc.com/why-your-it-provider-and-your-cybersecurity-provider-shouldnt-be-two-different-people/ Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:40:00 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=883 — And What That Means for Your Government Contract A lot of small government contractors are running their IT and their cybersecurity through two completely separate vendors. One company keeps the computers running. Another handles the security side. On paper, it sounds like a smart division of labor. In practice, it’s one of the most […]

The post Why IT and Cybersecurity Providers Shouldn’t Be Separate appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
  • Cybersecurity, Government Contractors

Why IT and Cybersecurity Providers Shouldn’t Be Separate

— And What That Means for Your Government Contract

  • Inforsys LLC

A lot of small government contractors are running their IT and their cybersecurity through two completely separate vendors. One company keeps the computers running. Another handles the security side. On paper, it sounds like a smart division of labor. In practice, it’s one of the most common — and most costly — setups we see.

Here’s the problem: IT and cybersecurity aren’t two different things. They’re the same thing looked at from two different angles. When they’re managed separately, things fall through the gap between them. And for government contractors, those gaps can show up in your next audit.

The gap nobody tells you about

When your IT provider and your security provider don’t talk to each other regularly, you get blind spots.

Your IT vendor patches what they can see. Your security vendor monitors what they’ve been given access to. But the devices your IT team onboarded last quarter? Your security vendor might not know about them yet. The new cloud tool your team started using? It may not be covered under your security monitoring scope.

Neither vendor is doing anything wrong. The problem is the structure itself. Two separate teams, two separate scopes, two separate invoices and a gap in the middle where your actual risk lives.

For government contractors, that gap is a compliance problem. DFARS and NIST SP 800-171 require you to know exactly what’s on your network, who has access to it, and how it’s being protected. If your IT team and your security team aren’t working from the same picture, you can’t honestly answer those questions.

Real talk from the field

We've seen contractors walk into audits with two vendors who had two completely different asset lists. Neither list was wrong, they were just each working from their own scope. The contractor had no single source of truth, and the auditor noticed immediately.

What a unified IT and security partner actually looks like

When your managed IT provider also handles your cybersecurity, a few things change immediately.

First, there’s one complete view of your environment. Every device, every user account, every application, all visible to the same team responsible for both keeping things running and keeping things secure. Nothing falls through the gap because there is no gap.

Second, response time improves dramatically. When something suspicious happens on your network, the team that spots it is the same team that can act on it. No waiting for a ticket to be handed off between vendors. No confusion about whose job it is to investigate.

Third, your compliance documentation gets a lot simpler. Instead of pulling records from two different systems and two different providers, everything lives in one place. When an auditor asks for your system security documentation, you have one point of contact — not two vendors pointing at each other.

The real cost of running them separately

Beyond the compliance risk, splitting IT and security across two vendors usually ends up costing more than a unified solution not less.

You’re paying two sets of management fees. You’re spending time coordinating between two teams. And when something goes wrong — a breach, a compliance finding, a failed audit — you’re dealing with two vendors who may have different accounts of what happened and who was responsible.

We’ve seen this play out with government contractors who assumed their IT setup was covered because they had two vendors. When the audit came, neither vendor had a complete picture of the environment. The contractor had to scramble to pull documentation together from both sides, and still came up short.

That’s an avoidable situation. But only if you catch it before the auditor does.

What to look for in a unified provider

Not every managed IT provider is equipped to handle federal contractor compliance. Here’s what to look for when evaluating whether a single provider can cover both sides effectively.

  • They understand DFARS and NIST SP 800-171 — not just in theory, but what those frameworks actually require from your IT environment day to day
  • They provide continuous monitoring, not just reactive support when something breaks
  • They can produce the documentation your contracting officer or auditor would ask for — asset inventories, access logs, incident records
  • They have experience working with government contractors specifically, not just general small business clients
  • They offer a clear scope of what’s covered — so you know exactly what’s protected and what isn’t

 

A good unified provider won’t just keep your systems running. They’ll make sure your systems are running in a way that holds up to scrutiny.

The bottom line

Running IT and cybersecurity through two separate vendors might feel like you’re covering your bases. But for government contractors with real compliance obligations, it usually means you’re paying more for less visibility and leaving a gap that auditors and attackers can both find.

The contractors who stay compliant and stay secure aren’t the ones with the most vendors. They’re the ones with the right partner.

Think your current setup has gaps?

Inforsys LLC provides unified managed IT and cybersecurity services built for SMB government contractors. We handle both sides, so nothing falls through the middle.

Schedule a consultation at www.inforsysllc.com

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post Why IT and Cybersecurity Providers Shouldn’t Be Separate appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]> Why Hackers Are Now Targeting Small Businesses First https://inforsysllc.com/why-hackers-are-now-targeting-small-businesses-first/ Mon, 29 Jun 2026 13:30:00 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=820 — And What Government Contractors Can’t Afford to Ignore Let’s be direct: hackers aren’t going after the big fish anymore. They’ve changed their strategy — and small businesses are now the preferred target. Here’s why. Large companies have gotten serious about security. They have dedicated IT teams, round-the-clock monitoring, and multiple layers of protection. As […]

The post Why Hackers Are Now Targeting Small Businesses First appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
  • Cybersecurity, Government Contractors, SMB

Why Hackers Are Now Targeting Small Businesses First

— And What Government Contractors Can't Afford to Ignore

  • Inforsys LLC

Let’s be direct: hackers aren’t going after the big fish anymore. They’ve changed their strategy — and small businesses are now the preferred target.

Here’s why. Large companies have gotten serious about security. They have dedicated IT teams, round-the-clock monitoring, and multiple layers of protection. As a result, breaking into one of those organizations takes months of work, expensive tools, and a high chance of getting caught. A small business with no real security setup? That can be compromised in hours.

For small businesses that hold government contracts, the risk is even higher. You’re handling sensitive federal data, you’re connected to larger contractors and agencies, and you’re legally required to meet security standards that many of you are still working toward. That gap doesn’t go unnoticed. In fact, attackers are scanning for it right now.

This isn’t a prediction. It’s what’s already happening.

The math makes you the target

Cybercriminals think like business owners — they go where the effort is lowest and the payoff is highest.

Breaking into a Fortune 500 company is a months-long project. Breaking into a 30-person government subcontractor with no security tools, however, is something automated software can do in an afternoon — for less than the cost of a monthly software subscription.

What makes it worse is this: a lot of small business owners assume they’re too small to be worth a hacker’s time. That assumption is exactly what attackers are counting on. They don’t pick victims at random. Instead, they run automated scans looking for businesses with outdated software, open ports, and weak setups. Small businesses show up constantly.

If you’re a government contractor, you’re an even more attractive target. Your systems may connect to federal networks. Your inbox likely contains sensitive acquisition data. And to a sophisticated attacker, you’re not just a target — you’re a side door into a larger agency or prime contractor.

5 ways attackers are getting in right now

These aren’t hypothetical scenarios. These are the methods showing up in real incidents across small businesses right now.

01 — Phishing emails that actually look real

AI tools have made phishing emails nearly impossible to spot. They're personalized, grammatically perfect, and written to match the tone of your actual vendors and contracting officers. As a result, most employees wouldn't think twice before clicking.

02 — Getting in through your vendors

You might not be the main target — you might be the way in. Attackers compromise smaller subcontractors to work their way into the networks of larger prime contractors and federal agencies. In other words, one weak link in the supply chain is all it takes.

03 — Impersonating someone you trust

Business email compromise works because small businesses rely heavily on email to approve payments and communicate with vendors. Because of that, attackers impersonate your CEO, a contracting officer, or a familiar supplier — and quietly redirect funds or pull sensitive files before anyone catches on.

04 — Ransomware for hire

You don't need to be a skilled hacker to run a ransomware attack anymore. Criminal groups now rent out ransomware tools to anyone willing to split the profits. Furthermore, small businesses are frequent targets because they're less likely to have backups or a recovery plan in place.

05 — Devices and apps your IT team doesn't know about

Personal laptops used for contract work, apps your team downloaded without approval, old devices nobody ever updated — these are open doors that attackers walk through regularly. If no one's keeping track of what's connected to your network, something is already slipping through.

Government contractors are a specific kind of target

Not every small business carries the same level of risk. If you hold a government contract, you’re in a different category entirely.

You’re required under your contract to protect federal data, follow specific security frameworks, and report incidents within strict timeframes. If you’re not meeting those requirements — and many small contractors aren’t fully there yet — you’re not just exposed to hackers. You’re also exposed to losing your contract, failing an audit, or facing legal liability.

Nation-state actors don’t always target agencies directly. Instead, they look for the smallest, least-protected link in the supply chain. That’s often a small subcontractor with incomplete security controls and no one actively watching their systems.

For government contractors, therefore, a security gap isn’t just a business risk — it’s a liability that follows you into every contract renewal and audit.

What to do about it

The good news is you don’t need a massive IT budget to fix the gaps attackers are looking for. You just need the right things in place, consistently.

  • Turn on multi-factor authentication everywhere — email, VPN, and admin accounts especially
  • Get endpoint protection on every work device, not just your servers
  • Know what devices and accounts exist on your network — you can’t secure what you don’t know about
  • Keep software updated — most ransomware attacks exploit vulnerabilities that vendors have already patched
  • Train your team regularly — one phishing click is all it takes
  • Work with a security provider who knows federal compliance — a general IT vendor won’t cut it here

 

If you’re a government contractor, you also need a written incident response plan, security controls your team has documented, and active monitoring on any system that touches federal data. These aren’t best practices — they’re contract requirements.

The bottom line

Hackers didn’t accidentally start targeting small businesses. They made a deliberate choice because the risk is low and the payoff is real.

The good news is that most of the gaps they’re exploiting are fixable. The question is whether you address them now — or after something goes wrong.

For government contractors, moreover, the stakes go beyond your own business. A breach at your firm can put federal data at risk, damage your contracting relationships, and potentially end your ability to win future awards.

You’re already on their radar. The only thing left to decide is whether you’re prepared.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post Why Hackers Are Now Targeting Small Businesses First appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]> The 72-Hour Compliance Clock After a Breach https://inforsysllc.com/the-72-hour-clock-what-smb-defense-contractors-must-do-after-a-breach/ Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:00:00 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=796 You just discovered a breach. Systems are down. Data may be compromised. Your first instinct? Wipe the machines and get back online fast. Stop — because that instinct could end your federal contracts. When a cyber incident hits an SMB defense contractor, it doesn’t just create one problem. It creates two at the same time. […]

The post The 72-Hour Compliance Clock After a Breach appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
  • Cybersecurity, DFIR, Federal Compliance, Incident Response

The 72-Hour Compliance Clock After a Breach

  • by Earl Freeman

You just discovered a breach. Systems are down. Data may be compromised.

Your first instinct? Wipe the machines and get back online fast.

Stop — because that instinct could end your federal contracts.

When a cyber incident hits an SMB defense contractor, it doesn’t just create one problem. It creates two at the same time. The first is the attack itself. The second — and often the more damaging one — is a compliance failure that happens because of how you respond. Federal incident reporting requirements under CMMC, FISMA, and DFARS aren’t suggestions. They’re contractual obligations with hard deadlines, strict forensic standards, and serious consequences if you get them wrong.

Here’s what the 72-hour clock actually demands of you.

Why incident reporting requirements are a legal problem, not just a technical one

Most small businesses treat cybersecurity as an IT issue. For defense contractors, however, it’s also a legal one.

Under DFARS 252.204-7012, contractors who handle Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) must report cyber incidents to the DoD Cyber Crime Center within 72 hours of discovery. On top of that, CMMC 2.0 Level 2 compliance — required for most DoD contracts — means you need a documented incident response plan that aligns with NIST SP 800-171.

FISMA and FedRAMP add even more requirements for contractors who touch federal systems. If you fail to report, or submit an incomplete report, you’re looking at contract suspension, debarment from future awards, or civil liability under the False Claims Act.

The breach itself is survivable. An accidental cover-up, though, usually isn’t.

What Triggers Mandatory Reporting Under DFARS 252.204-7012

  • Unauthorized access to systems that process, store, or transmit CUI
  • Exfiltration, manipulation, or destruction of covered defense information
  • Any compromise of systems supporting a DoD contract
  • Indicators of compromise even if you haven’t confirmed actual data loss

Your first 72 hours: what to do and in what order

Speed matters here, but so does sequence. Follow these steps in order.

  1. Isolate — don’t wipe. As soon as you suspect a breach, disconnect affected systems from the network. Don’t reimage, wipe, or factory-reset anything yet. Federal forensic investigators need disk images, memory captures, and system logs intact. Even if it’s unintentional, destroying potential evidence can be treated as obstruction.
  2. Preserve everything and start documenting. Capture timestamps, log files, access records, and any unusual activity you can find. Photograph error screens if that’s what you have. This documentation is what starts the chain of custody that federal auditors will review later — so start it immediately.
  3. Notify your Contracting Officer and DC3. Submit your incident report to the DoD Cyber Crime Center at dc3.mil within 72 hours. At the same time, notify your government Contracting Officer. Don’t wait until you have a full forensic report — report what you know now and update it as you learn more.
  4. Bring in a qualified DFIR provider. This isn’t the time to call your general IT vendor. You need a Digital Forensics and Incident Response specialist who understands federal contractor compliance — someone who can produce the kind of documentation that holds up to federal scrutiny and supports your regulatory submissions.

Why Chain of Custody Is Non-Negotiable

Federal incident reporting requirements don’t just ask what happened. They require proof of exactly how you responded.

Chain of custody is the documented, unbroken record of who touched the evidence, when they touched it, and how it was handled. For federal contractors, that means forensic disk images acquired with write-blockers, cryptographic hash verification, and transfer logs for every piece of evidence collected.

NIST SP 800-86 lays out the evidentiary standards you need to meet. Because of this, CMMC assessors will ask for these artifacts at your next audit. If they don’t exist — or if your IT team overwrote them while trying to restore systems quickly — you’ve created a compliance gap that no amount of retroactive documentation can fix.

CRITICAL EVIDENCE THAT MUST NOT BE DESTROYED

  • Volatile memory (RAM) it captures active processes and encryption keys
  • System and application event logs these show a timeline of attacker activity
  • Network traffic captures and firewall logs
  • Browser artifacts, prefetch files, and Windows Event Logs
  • Any removable media that was connected during the incident

Build the plan before you need it

The worst time to figure out your incident response plan is while a breach is actively happening.

The contractors who come through federal data breach incidents in the best shape aren’t necessarily the ones with the fastest IT teams. Instead, they’re the ones who already had documented procedures, had already retained qualified DFIR partners, and understood their incident reporting requirements long before anything went wrong.

CMMC certification requires a written incident response plan, regular tabletop exercises, and clearly defined roles for your team. So build that plan now, while you still have time. Test it. Make sure everyone knows who to call, what to preserve, and where to file the report before you’re forced to figure it out under pressure.

A breach tests your technical defenses. How you respond to it tests your federal trustworthiness. You need to pass both.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post The 72-Hour Compliance Clock After a Breach appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]> Why Risk Management Keeps You Up at Night https://inforsysllc.com/why-risk-management-keeps-you-up-at-night/ Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:01:00 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=349 — And How to Fix It Every security leader I talk to says some version of the same thing: “We know we have risks, but where do we even start?” It’s not that you don’t have security tools. Most organizations have plenty. The problem is figuring out what actually matters. You’re drowning in scan results, […]

The post Why Risk Management Keeps You Up at Night appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
Why Risk Management Keeps You Up at Night (And How to Fix It)

Why Risk Management Keeps You Up at Night

— And How to Fix It

  • by Earl Freeman

Every security leader I talk to says some version of the same thing: “We know we have risks, but where do we even start?”

It’s not that you don’t have security tools. Most organizations have plenty. The problem is figuring out what actually matters. You’re drowning in scan results, compliance requirements, and security alerts but which risks genuinely threaten your organization?

The Real Problem

Your vulnerability scanner flags thousands of issues. Your compliance checklist has hundreds of requirements. Your inbox is full of threat alerts. Leadership wants you to “manage the risk,” but the budget doesn’t match the to-do list.

So you do what you can. You fix the critical vulnerabilities. You implement the obvious controls. You write the required policies. But you’re always wondering: “Am I focusing on the right things? What am I missing?”

That’s not paranoia. It’s a reasonable response to an impossible situation.

What Actually Keeps People Up

Here’s what I hear most often:

“We don’t know where our important data actually is.” You’ve got files everywhere servers, cloud storage, people’s laptops, email. Some of it matters. Some of it doesn’t. But you can’t protect what you can’t find.

“Leadership doesn’t understand why we need more resources.” You’re talking about vulnerabilities and exploits. They’re thinking about business outcomes and budget constraints. You’re speaking different languages.

“We’re constantly reacting instead of planning.” Every day brings new fires to fight. You never get ahead of things because you’re always catching up.

Sound familiar?

A Different Approach

Effective risk management isn’t about eliminating every possible threat. That’s impossible. It’s about understanding what matters most to your organization and protecting that first.

Start with the basics:

What would genuinely hurt if it went down or got breached? Not what some framework says should matter, but what would actually impact your mission or business.

For a healthcare provider, it’s patient records and clinical systems. For a manufacturer, it’s production systems and intellectual property. For a financial institution, it’s transaction systems and customer data.

Once you know what matters most, work backward. What threats target those assets? What vulnerabilities exist? What protections do you already have? Where are the gaps?

This gives you context. Instead of treating every vulnerability equally, you can prioritize. That SQL injection in your public website that connects to your customer database? Critical. That same vulnerability in an internal dev server with no real data? Important, but not urgent.

Making It Manageable

Talk in terms leadership understands. Instead of “we have 5,000 vulnerabilities,” try “our customer database has three critical weaknesses that could lead to a breach. Here’s what it would cost to fix them versus what a breach would cost us.”

Accept that perfect security doesn’t exist. You’re not trying to eliminate all risk. You’re trying to reduce it to acceptable levels. Know what “acceptable” means for your organization—and get leadership agreement on that definition.

Build risk management into normal work. When you’re evaluating a new vendor, assessing risk should be part of that process, not a separate exercise. When you’re launching a new system, security considerations should be baked in from the start.

Review and adjust regularly. Your risk landscape changes. New threats emerge. Your business evolves. What mattered most six months ago might not be the top priority now. Set up quarterly reviews to reassess.

The Payoff

When you get risk management right, something shifts. You stop feeling like you’re constantly behind. You can explain security decisions in ways that make sense to non-technical people. You can justify your priorities and your budget asks.

Most importantly, you’re confident you’re protecting what actually matters instead of just responding to the loudest alarms.

It’s not about having zero vulnerabilities or perfect compliance. It’s about knowing your real risks and addressing them systematically.

That’s how you sleep better at night.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post Why Risk Management Keeps You Up at Night appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]> Closing the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Compliance https://inforsysllc.com/closing-the-gap-between-cybersecurity-and-compliance/ Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:35:00 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=335 Too often, organizations treat cybersecurity and compliance as separate problems. The security team focuses on stopping threats. The compliance team focuses on checking boxes. And nobody’s really talking to each other. The result? You end up with gaps. Your security might be solid, but you can’t prove it when auditors show up. Or you pass […]

The post Closing the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Compliance appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
Closing-the-Gap-Between-Cybersecurity-and-Compliance

Closing the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Compliance

  • Compliance, Cybersecurity
  • by Earl Freeman

Too often, organizations treat cybersecurity and compliance as separate problems. The security team focuses on stopping threats. The compliance team focuses on checking boxes. And nobody’s really talking to each other.

The result? You end up with gaps. Your security might be solid, but you can’t prove it when auditors show up. Or you pass your audit, but you’re not actually as protected as you think.

Why This Happens

I see this all the time. The security folks are busy putting out fires responding to alerts, fixing vulnerabilities, investigating incidents. The compliance people are buried in documentation, updating policies, preparing for the next audit.

Both teams are doing important work. But they’re working in parallel instead of together.

Last year, I worked with a federal contractor who had this exact problem. Their security operations were impressive good tools, skilled people, solid processes. But when audit time came, they couldn’t demonstrate that what they were doing actually met the requirements. The work was happening, but the documentation didn’t match.

They weren’t insecure. They just couldn’t prove it in a way auditors needed to see.

What Actually Works

Here’s the thing: frameworks like NIST 800-53 and FedRAMP aren’t just bureaucratic overhead. They’re actually blueprints for good security. They tell you what controls work based on years of real-world experience.

So instead of building your security program first and then scrambling to map it to compliance later, why not use the framework as your starting point?

Make security and compliance work together from day one. When you run vulnerability scans, capture those results in a way that satisfies both your security needs and your compliance documentation. When you update firewall rules, log it in your change management system. The work is already happening—you’re just making it count twice.

Stop treating audits as emergencies. If your security activities are already aligned with your compliance requirements, audits become routine checkpoints instead of panic-inducing events. You’re not scrambling for evidence because you’ve been collecting it all along.

Get both teams speaking the same language. Your security people should understand why certain controls are required. Your compliance people should understand what threats you’re actually defending against. They don’t need to be experts in each other’s domains, but they need enough shared knowledge to have productive conversations.

The Reality Check

When you integrate security and compliance properly, a few things happen:

  1. You stop wasting effort. No more implementing the same control twice because nobody coordinated. No more redoing work because it wasn’t documented the right way the first time.
  2. Your security gets better. Following a comprehensive framework means you’re not accidentally overlooking important protections because you’re too busy chasing the latest threat.
  3. Leadership gets it. When you can explain security investments in terms of both risk reduction and compliance requirements, it’s easier to justify budget and resources.
  4. You sleep better. Seriously. Knowing your security work is simultaneously building your compliance posture and that you can prove it reduces a lot of stress.

Where to Start

Pick one area to integrate first. Maybe it’s access controls or incident response. Work through the full cycle: implement the security measure, document it properly, and set up ongoing evidence collection. Get that working smoothly, then expand to other areas.

The key is stopping the separation between “we’re secure” and “we can prove we’re secure.” They should be the same thing.

Compliance frameworks exist because they work. Your security tools can generate compliance evidence with minimal extra effort. You just need to connect the dots.

That’s not checking boxes for the sake of it. That’s building real, demonstrable security resilience.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post Closing the Gap Between Cybersecurity and Compliance appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]> The Hidden Cost of “Good Enough” Security https://inforsysllc.com/the-hidden-cost-of-good-enough-security/ Sun, 09 Nov 2025 05:18:55 +0000 https://inforsysllc.com/?p=315 We’ve seen it happen more times than we can count. An organization invests heavily in compliance hires consultants, implements controls, passes their audit. Everyone celebrates. Mission accomplished. Then six months later, they’re dealing with a breach. What happened? They confused compliance with security. They implemented controls because the framework required them, not because those controls […]

The post The Hidden Cost of “Good Enough” Security appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>
The Hidden Cost of Good Enough Security

The Hidden Cost of “Good Enough” Security

  • Compliance
  • by Earl Freeman

We’ve seen it happen more times than we can count. An organization invests heavily in compliance hires consultants, implements controls, passes their audit. Everyone celebrates. Mission accomplished.

Then six months later, they’re dealing with a breach.

What happened? They confused compliance with security. They implemented controls because the framework required them, not because those controls addressed their actual risks. They documented policies that nobody followed. They checked boxes without understanding why those boxes existed.

The Compliance Trap

Don’t get me wrong, compliance matters. Standards like NIST 800-53, FISMA, and FedRAMP exist for good reasons. They’re built on decades of experience and real-world incidents. Following them systematically does make you more secure.

But here’s the catch: compliance frameworks tell you the minimum you need to do, not necessarily what your organization specifically needs to be secure.

Think of it like building codes for houses. Following building codes ensures your house won’t collapse or catch fire easily. That’s important. But it doesn’t mean your house is secure against burglars if you’re in a high-crime neighborhood. You might need additional measures that go beyond the basic code requirements.

What "Good Enough" Actually Costs

Last year, I worked with a company that had passed their audit with flying colors. They had all the required controls documented. Their policies looked great. On paper, they were compliant.

But when we did a security assessment, we found critical gaps. Their password policy met the minimum requirements but they had no monitoring for password reuse across systems. They had an incident response plan that satisfied auditors, but nobody had actually practiced it. They encrypted data at rest because the framework required it but sensitive data was regularly shared via unencrypted email.

Everything looked fine until you asked: “Would this actually stop an attack?”

The cost of “good enough” isn’t just the eventual breach though that’s certainly expensive. It’s also the false confidence. Leadership thinks they’re protected because they passed the audit. Resources get allocated elsewhere. Real security concerns get dismissed with “but we’re compliant.”

What Actually Makes You Secure

Real security starts with understanding your environment. What data do you have that someone might want? Who would want it? How would they try to get it?

Then you ask: do our controls actually address those threats? Not “do we have the required controls,” but “do these controls work for our specific situation?”

Sometimes the answer is yes. Frameworks are comprehensive for a reason. But sometimes you need more. Sometimes you need different.

A financial services company faces different threats than a healthcare provider. A small business with 50 employees has different risks than a federal agency with thousands. The frameworks give you a foundation, but you need to build on it based on your reality.

Beyond the Checklist

Here’s what security beyond compliance looks like:

You test your controls regularly. Not just document that they exist but verify they’re working. Run tabletop exercises. Conduct penetration tests. Try to break your own security and see what happens.

You adapt as threats evolve. Compliance requirements change slowly. Threats change fast. Don’t wait for the next framework update to address emerging risks.

You measure effectiveness, not just implementation. It’s not enough to say “we have endpoint protection deployed.” Ask “is our endpoint protection actually detecting and stopping threats?”

You involve people who actually do the work. Your security policies should reflect how your organization actually operates not some idealized version. If nobody follows a policy because it’s impractical, that policy isn’t helping you.

Finding Balance

I’m not saying to ignore compliance. Far from it. Meeting compliance requirements is often legally required and almost always beneficial.

But don’t stop there. Use compliance as your foundation, not your ceiling.

After you implement a control, ask yourself: “Does this actually reduce risk for us or are we just checking a box?” If the answer is just checking a box, think about how you could enhance that control to provide real value.

When you’re planning security investments, start with your risk assessment not just your compliance gaps. Sometimes they’re the same thing. Often they’re not.

The Real Goal

The goal isn’t to pass audits. The goal is to protect your organization’s mission and data. Compliance should support that goal, not replace it.

When you get this right, something interesting happens: you’re both more secure and more compliant. The controls you implement address real threats which makes them more effective. And because they’re effective, you can demonstrate their value to auditors more convincingly.

That’s not “good enough” security. That’s security done right.

And that’s what actually keeps you protected.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Ready to Get Started?

Find out how INFORSYS can help your organization manage risk, respond to incidents and build cyber resilience.

Talk to an Expert

The post The Hidden Cost of “Good Enough” Security appeared first on Inforsys LLC.

]]>